Who Is Depicted in the Image Below? Modern Art in Context

Chapter 9:Art and Power

Pamela J. Sachant and Rita Tekippe

9.i LEARNING OUTCOMES

After completing this chapter, you should be able to:

• Describe why and how art and artists have in some cultures been considered to accept exceptional ability.

• Distinguish between images of persuasion and propaganda, and specify characteristics of each.

• Recognize how and why images are used for such purposes as to display ability, influence society, and effect change.

• Indicate ways that images constitute and enhance a ruler'south position and say-so.

• Place changes in images of conflict, heroic action, and victims of violent confrontation in various cultures and time periods, including the artist's intentions as well as the public response.

• Distinguish betwixt and describe the prohibition of images enforced within some religions.

• Draw why protestors or conquerors might destroy images and monuments of a past or defeated civilization.

ix.2 INTRODUCTION

Art has ever been associated with power. At times in history, the individuals who made art were seen as having special powers. They could conceptualize shapes and forms and then bring them into beingness. They could create images and objects from dirt, ashes, and stone that looked like living creatures. These individuals were set autonomously—they could transform, they could give life. And the images and objects they created held powers, besides. They were a ways of communication with an unseen earth, of exerting influence over the well-existence and actions of humans. Then both the artists and their art were considered to be magical in that they were out-of-the-realm of everyday, common, and shared existence: they were super-natural and extra-ordinary.

The ancient Greeks believed the creativity artists possessed came to them from a muse , a personification of cognition and the arts that inspired them to write, sculpt, and compose. The ancient Romans, who strongly believed in the family as the most basic and essential hub of societal organization, called its guiding spirit the genius , from the Latin verb pregnant genui or "to bring into existence or create." The discussion genius came to be associated with the arts during the Renaissance, when it took on the meaning of inspiration and ingenuity visited upon the artist, often every bit a form of possession, setting the artist autonomously from, and at odds with, non-geniuses.

In addition to the power of the artist, in that location is the power of the art itself to imitate or mimic life. Again, according to the aboriginal Greeks, art'due south power resides in its power to correspond nature; the closer, more existent, and more than natural the representation, the closer the art piece of work is to truth, beauty—and power. Amongst other cultures, especially those that avert representation, art is still a means of aesthetic expression with considerable power, but with abstracted forms. For example, in Islamic cultures the human figure and forms based on directly ascertainment are not used in religious fine art and compages as only God has the ability to create living things. Instead, elaborate ornamentation based on the written word and homo, fauna, and establish forms is used to decorate surfaces with intricate motifs, or patterns.

The visual force of the image or object, whether representational or non-representational, has been used throughout the ages by those in power to requite class to and communicate messages about themselves, their wishes or dictates, their accomplishments, and their very right to rule. Literacy has, until the recent by, in human history been a skill few had the means to develop, but leaders in secular and religious roles have fostered amid their subjects and followers a visual literacy, the power to "read" and understand images through a mutual "language" of subjects, symbols, and styles. Those who wish to use their art as a ways of protest confronting an established power have traditionally used the same "vocabulary" to visually communicate their letters, as well. Especially in times of war and during periods of oppression, art has been used as a tool to protest, certificate, provide an culling version, and communicate to others near people and events that become our historical record.

ix.3 PROPAGANDA, PERSUASION, POLITICS, AND Power

The word propaganda has gotten a bad reputation. The Latin origin of the word propaganda is propagare , meaning "to spread or disseminate." As it is used today, the word mainly refers to promoting data—often biased or misleading, sometimes subconscious—in order to influence views, beliefs, or behavior. Originally, the word was non associated with politics, as it is more often than not today, nor did information technology imply lies or bad organized religion; propaganda was only a means of publicly communicating ideas, instruction, and the like. In such a instance, we at present are more probable to apply the discussion persuasion , which has a more than neutral connotation and suggests convincing rather than coercing. For instance, advertizement tries to persuade—or entice—the consumer to brand a pick or buy. To many, however, there is a fine line between propaganda and persuasion. They are separated more past purpose and intention—expert, bad, or neutral—than how they are carried out. Garth Jowett and Victoria O'Donnell describe the fine simply crucial differences between the two words:

Propaganda is the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, dispense cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist. Persuasion is interactive and attempts to satisfy the needs of both persuader and persuadee. ^one

King Darius I (r. 522-486 BCE) had both persuasion and propaganda in heed when he built the Apadana at Persepolis, today Islamic republic of iran. (Figure nine.1) Darius I was the first male monarch of the Achaemenid Empire (c. 550-330 BCE) to have royal structures erected on the site, just construction would continue nether succeeding Persian kings for approximately one hundred years. The Apadana was begun in 515 BCE and completed thirty years later by Darius I's son, Xerxes I. Apadana means hypostyle hall, a stone edifice with a roof supported by columns. It originally had seventy-two columns—13 still stand—each sixty-two anxiety tall in a thousand hall that was 200 10 200 feet, or iv,000 square feet. Needless to say, a building of such monumental proportions was an overwhelming sight for those who approached it. Brightly painted in many colors and raised on a platform with the Kuh-e Rahmat or Mountain of Mercy ascent behind information technology, the towering construction could be seen for miles from the sparsely vegetated plain to the east.

Figure 9.i | Apadana staircase, Persepholis, Iran

Author: User "Fabienkhan"

Source: Wikimedia Eatables

License: Copyright, Special Permissions Granted

For King Darius I, the Apadana and Persepolis—the metropolis of Persians—every bit a whole was a statement of propaganda. The hypostyle hall and the city were awe-inspiring and intimidating; they in no uncertain terms let the viewer know the Rex had formidable power and tremendous resources. Upon entering the King'south hall, the viewer was surrounded by his strength in the course of columns the height of a modernistic six-story building, holding up a ceiling of incalculable weight. How small and powerless the visitor was in the midst of such force. Simply Darius I, whose empire stretched from Arab republic of egypt in the west to the Indus Valley, today Islamic republic of pakistan, to the east, knew that he could not effectively rule through domination and fear. So, he had elements of persuasion included at Persepolis, as well. In addition to the building'due south resplendent majesty, it was adorned with sumptuous and masterful frescoes, glazed brickwork, and relief sculpture. Two staircases led upward to the platform on which the Apadana was congenital, on the north and east sides, but but the northward staircase was completed during Darius's lifetime. That staircase and the platform walls to either side are covered with reliefs: figures in even, orderly rows as they approach the Persian King's hall. (Effigy ix.2) They are representatives of the 20-iii countries inside the Achaemenid Empire, coming to pay homage to the Male monarch during festivals for the New year's day, carrying gifts. Accompanying them are Farsi dignitaries, followed past soldiers with their weaponry, horses, and chariots.

Figure 9.2 | Reliefs at Persepholis

Author: User "Ziegler175"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: CC By-SA 3.0

The native Persian and foreign-built-in delegates are shown together in these friezes , or rows, of relief sculpture. (Figure 9.3) They have facial features that correspond with their ethnicity, and hair, clothing, and accessories that signal what region they are from. Even the gifts are objects and animals from their own countries. Rather than showing the foreigners as subservient to the Persians, they mingle with one another and at times appear to exist in chat.

Figure 9.3 | The Apadana Palace, Persepolis, Iran

Author: User "Happolati"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

The staircase reliefs, as opposed to the magnificent building equally a whole, tin be seen every bit a form of persuasion. Information technology was in the male monarch's ameliorate interests to win over his subjects, to gain their trust, allegiance, and cooperation, than to bend them to his will through force and subjugation. Having already demonstrated from a altitude that he had the power to defeat his enemies, Darius I could, as the delegates ascended the stairs to his neat hall, literally testify them the respect with which he treated his loyal subjects.

In more than contempo history, Jacques-Louis David (1748-1825, France) painted five versions of Napoleon Crossing the Alps between 1801 and 1805. (Figure ix.iv) David was built-in and raised in Paris and entered the École des Beaux-Arts in 1866 at the historic period of xviii. After eight years of mixed success in his studies there, David won the Prix de Rome in 1774, a prestigious government scholarship that also included travel to Italia. He lived in Rome from 1775 to 1780, studying the art of smashing masters from the classical by, through the Renaissance, and to the present. But, he was most impressed with the philosophical and creative ideals of some of his contemporaries, the Neoclassical thinkers and painters he met in Italy.

Figure 9.4 | Napoleon Crossing the Alps

Artist: Jacques-Louis David

Writer: User "Garoutcha"

Source: Wikimedia Eatables

License: Public Domain

When he returned to France, he presently began exhibiting work in this new mode; with their somber, moral tones, stories of family loyalty and patriotic duty, fine detail, and sharp focus, works in the Neoclassical style (c. 1765-1830) were in stark dissimilarity to the frivolous, sentimental subjects and delicate, pastel hues of the prevailing Rococo way (c. 1700-1770s). Over the grade of the 1780s, equally social disconnect and political upheaval were building toward the French Revolution of 1789, the self-sacrificing, stoic heroes from classical and contemporary history David painted increasingly reflected the public desire for liberté , egalité , fraternité , or liberty, equality, and fraternity (universal brotherhood).

In the aftermath of the revolution, during the mercurial times of the 1790s, David was first a powerful figure in the brusk-lived Democracy so a jailed outcast. When Napoleon Bonaparte, named First Consul in 1799, commissioned David to paint his portrait in 1800, yet, David's render to official favor was complete. The commission came well-nigh this way: in the bound of 1800, Napoleon led troops south to back up French troops already in Genoa, Italia, in an attempt to have back land captured by the Austrians. He did so on June 9th at the Boxing of Marengo. The victory led to French republic and Spain re-establishing diplomatic relations eleven years after the French Revolution and, equally office of the formal substitution of gifts to mark the occasion, Male monarch Charles IV of Spain requested a portrait of Napoleon to hang in the Majestic Palace of Madrid. Learning of this, Napoleon requested three more versions from David (and the painter independently created a fifth, which remained in his possession until his decease.)

It was to exist an equestrian portrait, Napoleon specified, that is, depicting him on horseback, crossing the Great St. Bernard Pass in the Alps, leading the Reserve Ground forces south to Italy. David was to bear witness Napoleon on a spirited, rearing horse as a calm and decisive leader, much similar his heroes Hannibal and Charlemagne, who crossed the Alps before Napoleon and whose names are inscribed with his on rocks in the left foreground of the painting. In authenticity, however, it did not happen that fashion at all: Napoleon crossed on the Alps on the dorsum of a mule, in good weather condition, a few days after the soldiers went through the pass.

What Napoleon was request David to paint was a piece of propaganda. And, the artist succeeded admirably. With the wind whipping his cloak around him, assuredly holding the reins of his wild-eyed horse in i hand while gesturing the way up and over the peaks with the other, and belongings the viewer'southward gaze with his look of complete composure, David has shown Napoleon as a leader who guides his people to victory and who will be remembered as a hero throughout the ages. That was the story Napoleon wanted told: the timeless ideal of the great man, non the transitory pettiness of his physical likeness. For, every bit Napoleon is attributed with claiming, "History is the version of by events that people have decided to hold upon."

9.4 IMAGERY OF State of war

Considering the potential for art to give expressive form to ideas and emotions, it is not surprising that art has often been used to present a wide range of messages most state of war, 1 of the most dramatic of man events. All forms of fine art take been used for documenting war, stating reasons for supporting or opposing it, and showing reflections nigh its meanings, implications, and effects. On a broader scale, all man activities, of grade, may be occasions for people to criticize one another, to condemn ideas, ideals, and actions, to promote or oppose causes that express cultural, societal, or individual values. We will examine a number of works that are concerned with these issues in various ways.

9.4.one Historical/Documentary

From the earliest times, artists have responded to issues of state of war and conquest and their implications for the cultures in which they took place. Often, the fine art appears to have been created to marking a moment of triumph and to interpret the conquest as a validation of a leader's correct to rule, established through the victory. Such was the case with the Palette of Narmer. (Figure ix.5) On the ii-sided palette are relief-carved depictions of the subjugation of the enemy by Egyptian Rex Narmer (also referred to equally Menes)—under the watchful protection of the deities—and a procession of the Male monarch and his attendants toward the decapitated bodies of x of the defeated. On the beginning side, Narmer wears the crown of Upper Egypt and on the contrary he wears the crown of Lower Egypt, symbolizing the matrimony of the two regions nether ane ruler (c. three,100-3,050 BCE). He is depicted far larger than both his enemies and his own men, showing the figures' relative importance. Narmer is literally depicted every bit a powerful, house, and resolute warrior who will exist a strong and worthy leader.

Effigy 9.5 | Narmer Palette

Writer: User "Nicolas Perrault Iii"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

Grand artistic depictions of rulers in boxing have always been used to help grade their reputations and to eternalize the images of their good and wise rulership. Military success has long been equated, correctly or not, with political prowess. The heroic feats of Alexander the Corking (r. 336323 BCE) at the Battle of Issus (333 BCE) with the powerful Persian King Darius III (r. 336-330 BCE) were portrayed in a Greek painting that no longer exists. Like much of Greek art, though, it was copied past the Romans, so we do have a mosaic version of the tumultuous boxing that was created for the Business firm of the Faun in Pompeii, Italy. (Effigy 9.6) This enormous depiction, although damaged and at present incomplete, gives a lively, somewhat riotous account of the dramatic run across of these 2 renowned warriors. Alexander tin can be seen to the left on his anecdote horse, staring with wide-eyed intensity at the fleeing Darius, who turns to await at his opponent with 1 arm extended as if pleading for mercy while the driver of his chariot whips the Male monarch'south horses into a frenzy of movement.

Figure 9.vi | Alexander Mosaic

Author: User "Berthold Werner"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: CC By-SA 3.0

We should consider to what extent these accounts are documentary , based on factual records, and what we tin discern that is propagandistic in purpose. In many eras, the glorification of heroes and heroic deeds in state of war was maybe paramount, non just from a political and patriotic standpoint, simply as well because these were the values promoted equally part of artistic training in academic settings (values that prevailed for most successful artists at least through the eye of the nineteenth century, when anti-bookish rebellions began in art circles). American heroism in war was certainly envisioned in these terms, every bit evidenced in Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker Hill by John Trumbull . (Figure 9.vii) Equally discussed in Chapter 8 Art and Identity, Trumbull was an aide-de-campsite to General George Washington. Afterwards witnessing Warren's death in Boston, Trumbull was commissioned past Warren'southward family to immortalize the event. The Battle of Bunker Hill took place in 1775, the commencement year of the American Revolutionary State of war. Although the colonialists were defeated, the British were stunned by their far greater number of casualties, boosting the morale of the young army. In his painting, Trumbull focused on the General's tragic death as the colonial forces retreated, equally well equally the pity of British major John Small, who held back ane of his men as the soldier was near to bayonet Warren. Doing so, Trumbull could celebrate the heroism of the Americans while besides acknowledging the honorable beliefs of the enemy, an expectation in eighteenth-century codes of comport during pitched battles.

Figure 9.7 | The Expiry of Full general Warren at the Boxing of Bunker's Loma, June 17, 1775

Artist: John Trumbull

Author: Boston Museum of Fine Arts

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

Trumbull's delineation of the battle scene is greatly romanticized: an historically accurate rendering of Full general Warren's death was neither expected nor desired by viewers of the solar day. Many questions have been asked, as well, about the accurateness of the grand tableau by Emanuel Leutze (1816-1868, Federal republic of germany, lived United states) of Washington Crossing the Delaware , a painting that is an iconic symbol of the American Revolutionary War and the outset president of the United States. (Effigy 9.8) Leutze created the work in 1851, lxx-v years later the Battle of Trenton occurred in 1776. Far from attempting to reconstruct the scene every bit it took place, Leutze intended his work to be an evocation of a thou and inspirational event, dramatically pictured.

Figure 9.8 | Washington Crossing the Delaware

Creative person: Emanuel Leutze

Author: Google Cultural Found

Source: Wikimedia Eatables

License: Public Domain

Past the time Frederic Remington (1861-1909, USA) painted Charge of the Rough Riders in 1898 , warfare and depictions of it were much different. Remington gives united states of america the spirit of the fray—more down to earth, momentary, and crude and tumble. (Effigy 9.9) The implications are much less aggrandized and heroic, the viewer's sense of the event much more intimate. And by the time of the World War I advent of Gassed by John Vocalist Sargent (1858-1925, United states of america, lived England) , we come across a different tenor altogether. (Figure 9.ten) Here, we are privy to Sargent'south personal response to the deadly aspects of state of war, to the after-furnishings for the individuals who were each physically assaulted by poison mustard gas and are showing its ill effects as they were weakened, nauseated, and felled. The changes in interpretation are due in office to those changes towards realism in art during the nineteenth century that we take explored. Also, they were heightened past the advent and evolution of photography, which had enhanced potential for documentation of bodily conditions. Simply photography did not, by whatsoever ways, always present the viewer with unvarnished truth, since it could, like painting, be manipulated in its effects. All the same, the potential for a unlike view of war and its effects was ushered in with the advent of photography.

Figure nine.nine | Accuse of the Crude Riders at San Juan Hill

Artist: Frederic Remington

Author: User "Julius Morton"

Source: Wikimedia Eatables

License: Public Domain

Figure 9.ten | Gassed

Creative person: John Vocalizer Sargent

Writer: User "DcoetzeeBot"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

The American Civil War provided a venue for photographers to use the new medium in recording exactly what they were seeing, through the lens. But the processes were nevertheless not up to the task of capturing the actions, because equipment was cumbersome, and exposed photographic plates had to be developed on the spot in peculiarly outfitted wagons. The result was that most of the photographs were of groups of dead bodies and battlefields laid waste material, after the actual event. (Figure 9.11) The sights were even so sobering to the viewers who had never before been privy to views of the result of state of war on such a scale. Alexander Gardner (1821-1882, Scotland, lived USA) was one of a number of photographers who captured many battlefield scenes, as well every bit views of campsites and many other details of the deployments, including visits from such dignitaries as President Lincoln. (Figure nine.12)

Figure nine.eleven | Photograph of bodies on the battlefield of Antietam during the American Civil War

Lensman: Alexander Gardner

Author: User "Shauni"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

Effigy 9.12 | Photo of Allan Pinkerton, President Abraham Lincoln, and Major General John A. McClernand

Photographer: Alexander Gardner

Author: User "Bobanny"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

The potential for a more disquisitional interpretation afforded by photography had in the past been taken at times, even though not as the norm. Notable examples come up from several periods when artists responded to the horrors and agonies of war and injustice in various ways and created memorable interpretations that reveal their protests of conditions. In 1633, Jacques Callot (15921635, France) created a suite of panoramic etchings that dramatize The Miseries of State of war . (Figure 9.xiii) Francisco Goya's monumental Third of May, 1808 , painted in 1814, showed the fear and horror of an meet betwixt Napoleon's troops and citizens of the town of Medina del Rio Seco, where 3,500 Spaniards lost their lives. (Figure ix.14) Goya'southward sympathies are clear in his presentation of a terrified white-shirted martyrlike figure facing a firing squad while in the midst of his equally horrified compatriots.

Figure 9.13 | The miseries of state of war; No. xi, "The Hanging"

Creative person: Jacques Callot

Author: artgallery.nsw.gov.au

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

Figure 9.14 | The Tertiary of May

Creative person: Francisco de Goya y Lucientes

Author: Prado in Google Earth

Source: Wikimedia Eatables

License: Public Domain

Similarly, Honoré Daumier dramatized the injustice of a night raid in the home of a working-class family unit in Paris during protests in 1834. Following a shot having been fired from a window in the building where twelve members of the Breffort family unit lived, soldiers stormed their apartment and killed them all. 6 months later, Daumier created, a stark lithograph depicting helpless family members equally they fell. (Figure nine.15) Daumier had been jailed ii years earlier, in 1832, for caricatures (portraits containing features or characteristics exaggerated for comic issue) he made ridiculing King Louis Phillipe I (r. 1830-1848). Immediately after the artist created Rue Transnonain , the street on which the Breffort family unit lived, the lithographic stones he used were confiscated by government officials and all copies of the print were destroyed. The following year, political caricatures were banned entirely. This indicates the power Daumier's piece of work was perceived as having and the danger it could concord for those in power. Equally noted, the potential for a different view of state of war and its effects was ushered in with the advent of photography. The American Civil State of war in the 1860s provided a venue for photographers to employ the new medium in recording exactly what they were seeing, through the lens. Only the processes were still not up to the job of capturing the actions, considering equipment was cumbersome and exposure times were still relatively long and tiresome. Alexander Gardner'due south photographic corps created many later on boxing scenes as well every bit portraits of generals, the president, campsites, and many other details of the deployments. (Figures 5.18 and 5.19) The potential for capturing action and momentary pathos only increased from then on, and the capacity for documenting graphic events has been used widely ever since. (Figures v.20, 5.21, 5.22, 5.23) Compare the paradigm of corpses being bulldozed and buried wholesale to the photos of Gardner and the previous painted glorifications of the battleground.

Figure nine.fifteen | Rue Transnonain, le 15 Avril, 1834, Plate 24 of l'Clan mensuelle

Creative person: Honoré Daumier

Source: Met Museum

License: OASC

9.4.2 Reflective/Reactionary and Anti-state of war

One of the nigh powerful anti-war statements ever painted was by Pablo Picasso, created in 1937 following the bombing of the town of Guernica during the Spanish Civil War. He was commissioned by the Spanish Republican Regime to create a mural for that land'southward pavilion at the 1937 Earth's Fair in Paris and, afterward learning of the attack, designed this poignant brainchild of symbolic and iconic motifs to limited the horror of the event. ( Pavilion of the Spanish Republic at the Paris International Exposition, 1937 ) His knowledge of the details had been gleaned from newspaper reporting, so he elected to create the imagery in the graphic blackness, greyness, and white of the photographs through which he learned of the bombing and its impact. His dramatic distortions of form convey the deep anguish and disgust that had been engendered in him, his beau Spaniards, and the globe.

Over the course of the twentieth century, documentary photography was used non merely to capture the roughshod events of war, but as well to broadcast moments of utter horror in such graphic ways that they take influenced public sentiment, sometimes turning stance from support to outrage. By the time of World War I, technology permitted the reproduction of photographs in newspapers, which meant that the average citizen had far greater access to visual news of the war than in earlier conflicts. Some leaders, such as High german Kaiser Wilhelm Ii (r. 1888-1918), were in favor of using photographs every bit a means of bolstering public support for the war, but others restricted photographers' access and censored photographs, citing security concerns. Presently before the showtime of Globe State of war I, the British Army was the first to realize the potential of photography for aerial reconnaissance, greatly expanding their inquiry capabilities and troop maneuverability. (Effigy 9.xvi)

Figure nine.sixteen | Aeriform Photography Before the First Globe State of war

Artist: Laws F C V (Sgt)

Writer: User "Fae"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

During World State of war Two, American military and authorities agencies tremendously expanded the use of photography for purposes ranging from conducting espionage and profitable grooming, to recording atrocities and providing documentation. (Figures nine.17 and 9.xviii) During the Vietnam War (U.s. interest, 1955-1975), the American military gave unprecedented access to non-military reporters and photographers. Equally the war extended in the 1960s, far longer than the American people expected, images of conflict and suffering in the war-torn country began having an impact on public opinion. ( Women and children crouch in a dingy canal as they take cover from intense Viet Cong fire, Horst Faas ) Past 1972, when Nick Ut (b. 1951, Vietnam, lives USA) photographed children fleeing their village after it was attacked with napalm, the tide had turned and many Americans no longer supported the Vietnam State of war. ( Phan Thị Kim Phúc running downwards a road near Trảng Bàng, Vietnam, later a napalm bomb was dropped on the village of Trảng Bàng by a plane of the Vietnam Air Force, Huynh Cong Ut )

Effigy 9.17 | Bones of anti-Nazi High german women in the crematoriums in the German language concentration camp at Weimar (Buchenwald), Germany

Photographer: Pfc. Westward. Chichersky

Author: User "Petrusbarbygere"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

Figure nine.eighteen | Two enlisted men of the illfated U.South. Navy aircraft carrier LISCOME BAY, torpedoed by a Japanese submarine in the Gilbert Islands, are buried at sea from the deck of a Coast Guard-manned assault transport.

Author: User "West.wolny"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

9.4.iii Prohibition or Destruction of Imagery: Iconoclas

Controversy over imagery and its use, especially in sacred contexts, also has a long history. Debates on the topic accept, at times, erupted into deep and biting arguments. It has often been thought that, considering of the Old Testament statements forbidding the use of idols, the Jewish organized religion has never immune pictorial or figural art equally role of its religious expression. More than current findings, though, pb to the decision that the biblical statements were actually pointedly made at times against the real danger of idolatry, or the worship of idol images, rather than beingness a wide prohibition of images altogether. Dura-Europos was a military outpost in Syria held by the Romans 114-257 CE where the garrisoned soldiers obviously practiced a wide variety of religions. The site has a great number of different heathen temples, a Christian house church, and a Jewish synagogue , or firm of worship, that is busy with a keen assortment of lively figural frescoes that depict Old Testament stories. (Figure 9.19)

Figure nine.19 | Part of the fresco at the Dura-Europos synagogue

Author: User "Udimu"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

Early Buddhist art was, co-ordinate to some, aniconic , or characterized past the avoidance of figural imagery that represented Sakyamuni Buddha, its fifth-century BCE founder. Others disagree. We accept no examples of Buddhist art until the second century BCE, well later on the expiry of Sakyamuni, probably because early works were of impermanent materials and accept not endured. In the earliest we exercise have, the figure of the Buddha does not appear; rather, we see the seat where he achieved enlightenment and the Bodhi tree that shaded it (Figures 9.20) Scholars disagree as to whether the absence of the Buddha confirms a prohibition of showing his figure.

Figure 9.20 | Mara's attack on the Buddha

Author: User "Gurubrahma"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: CC BY-SA 3.0

On the contrary, we do know there is a general aversion to the use of figural imagery in sacred uses in Islam, although it is not universally heeded. There is no specific prohibition in the Koran, the fundamental sacred scripture for Islam; nonetheless, at that place are administrative statements amid the writings of the Hadith, the commentaries on the Koran that supplement its teachings. The rationale is that the creation of man and beast form is reserved for God and should not be an act of man. Thus, the decorations of mosques and related structures are usually achieved with lavish linear scripts, embellished with arabesques and vegetal and floral motifs. (Figure 9.21) The script is unremarkably drawn from the Koran or is simple praise of Allah; this sort of design is often also applied to all sorts of goods and décor for the Muslim household. (Figure nine.22)

Figure 9.21 | Mihrab of Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba

Author: User "Ingo Mehling"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: CC By-SA 4.0

Figure 9.22 | Seventeenth-Century Persian Bowl

Writer: User "Udimu"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

A dramatic example of the anti-imagery debate took place in the Byzantine Christian Church in the 8th and ninth centuries CE. Based on the perception of the biblical prohibition, an assault was mounted against all religious images, and much of the existing artwork was destroyed in an endeavor to eradicate what was considered an evil practice. The defenders of the use of imagery argued that the problem was not the images themselves, which could be positive aids to spiritual inspiration and religious devotion, only to their improper usage, which resulted in a sort of idolatry, akin to pagan idol worship. The images, co-ordinate to proponents of their use, should be seen as tools, associated with understanding God and the saints, and as means of furthering the contemplation of Christian mysteries. Further, they argued, to obliterate existing images, to deface pictures and to destroy statues was to desecrate sacred things and, effectively, to boldness the holy beings which they represented.

This notion was expressed in the mid-ninth-century Chludov Psalter with an illustration that equates the devastation of an icon with insulting Christ on the cantankerous when he was forced to take gall (bile) and vinegar by the mocking Roman soldiers. (Figure 9.23) The controversy was settled in 843 and the use of icons and imagery thrived thereafter. Unfortunately, very lilliputian of the religious artwork that was produced prior to this fourth dimension survived for usa to examine.

Figure 9.23 | Miniature from the 9thcentury Chludov Psalter with scene of iconoclasm. Iconoclasts John Grammaticus and Anthony I of Constantinople.

Writer: User "Shakko"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

Other chapters in the fence over imagery open in later centuries. For some Christians, it was one point of disagreement leading to the Protestant Reformation that began in Wittenberg, Germany, in 1517. Co-ordinate to those protesting what they saw as abuses of ability in the Roman Catholic Church building, the proliferation of images of holy figures and stories from the Bible distracted the faithful from true worship: reading the word of God in the Bible. Equally new religious practices spread, there was a widespread removal of religious paintings and sculpture from all churches and public buildings. (Figure 9.24) In the Wars of Religions that raged in many places in Europe (c. 1524-1648), the devastation of images was one of the fierce forms of protest past angry crowds that railed against any and all prevailing practices and the powers they held responsible. A not bad many church portals (doors) were damaged by those who saw lopping off heads of sculptures above the doorways as a plumbing equipment expression of their anti-Church sentiment. (Figure ix.25)

Figure 9.24 | Iconoclasts in a church building

Artist: Dirck van Delen

Author: User "BoH"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

Effigy nine.25 | 16th-century iconoclasm in the Protestant Reformation. Relief statues in St. Stevenskerk in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, were attacked and defaced in the Beeldenstorm.

Author: User "Ziko"

Source: Wikimedia Eatables

License: CC By-SA iii.0

Throughout history, such destruction has certainly not been restricted to religious controversies. From very early on examples, we know of what is likely purposeful defacement of ruler images that were fabricated either in protest or as a sort of declaration of defeat and superiority. The gouging out of the jeweled optics in this bronze caput of Assyrian King Sargon 2 might have been for theft of the precious materials, but it may as well point conquest over the man himself. (Figure 9.26) In recent times, we accept seen the dramatic toppling in 2003 of the statue of Sadam Hussein in a public foursquare in Baghdad, Iraq, as a symbolic overthrow of a despised and despotic ruler. (Figure 9.27) Further humiliation of him was conspicuously intended by the widespread publication of photos of captors picking lice from his head after his discovery in a spider hole.

Effigy 9.26 | Bronze head of a rex, well-nigh likely Sargon of Akkad but possibly Naram-Sin.

Writer: Iraqi Directorate General of Antiquities

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

Figure 9.27 | Statue of Saddam Hussein being toppled in Firdos Square later the US invasion of Republic of iraq.

Photographer: U.S. military employee

Author: User "Ipankonin"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: Public Domain

The power of such pointed symbolism in visual terms is employed to fight culture wars, besides. In Afghanistan, in 2001, the Taliban undertook to dynamite two colossal images of the Buddha dating to the 6th century CE that had been carved into the side of a cliff in the Bamyan valley of fundamental Afghanistan. (Effigy 9.28) Arguments came from all over the world, pleading with them to preserve monuments that were considered role of the cultural heritage of humankind. Nonetheless, they completed their chore, declaring it a duty to eliminate an image that violated their spiritual beliefs.

Figure 9.28 | The taller Buddha of Bamiyan before (left) and after destruction (right).

Writer: User "Tsui"

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: CC By-SA 3.0

A similar scenario unfolded more recently, when ISIS militants went on a destructive campaign to destroy historically and culturally valued artwork in the Mosul Museum, Republic of iraq, despite pleas from curators and art lovers effectually the world. ( Extremists used sledgehammers and power drills to smash ancient artifacts at a museum in the northern city of Mosul ) This sort of protest is frequently made on a smaller scale, also, when symbolic or iconic imagery is defaced or destroyed every bit a means of mocking its value to those who respect it, equally with the Nazi symbols made on Jewish gravestones or the burning of the American flag. ( Desecrated Jewish gravestones ) (Figure ix.29) All such incidents reinforce our understanding of the varieties of power that art and visual imagery can take.

Figure 9.29 | Desecration of the U.South. Flag past called-for

Author: Jennifer Parr

Source: Wikimedia Commons

License: CC BY ii.0

nine.5 BEFORE YOU MOVE ON

Key Concepts

Due to their ability to create art, throughout history artists have often been considered to take special and mysterious powers. Images can be used to enhance the power of an private, arrangement of government, or grade of religion. Artists can use images to bring attention to and accept an bear upon on social issues. Images of war tin can be used to validate and strengthen a ruler'south authority and ability. From the nineteenth century to the present, violent conflicts accept been depicted with a greater range of imagery, in part due to technological advances and social attitudes toward the bear on of war. Imagery is forbidden inside some religions based on interpretations of religious texts. The destruction of images tin can be the result of religious, social, or political behavior or protests.

Exam Yourself

1. Describe why and how fine art and artists have in some cultures been considered to accept exceptional power.

2. What are propaganda and persuasion, and what are some differences between them?

3. How did King Darius I employ images of both persuasion and propaganda at the Apadana in Persepolis?

4. Describe how rulers accept used images of them to raise their authorisation.

5. How and why did images of state of war change in the United States from the time of Revolutionary State of war through World State of war I?

6. Give an example of an art work that was meant to protest war or social injustice, and depict how it did then.

7. Describe how and why Nick Ut and Pablo Picasso focused on the individual in their depictions of war.

8. Why are images forbidden within some religions? Requite specific examples.

9. What prompted the destruction and abstention of religious images during the Protestant Reformation?

10. Explain why images of a defeated or dead ruler or monuments of an occupied culture might be defaced or destroyed.

9.6 KEY TERMS

Aniconic : the avoidance of figural imagery within a organized religion

Caricature : portrait containing features or characteristics exaggerated for comic effect

Documentary : in creative or written forms, work that records actual events every bit they happened

Frieze : a horizontal row of relief sculpture or painting on a building

Genius : (from the Latin genui : to bring into being or create) a person of remarkable intelligence or with outstanding artistic abilities

Muse : personification of knowledge and the arts, and inspiration to write, sculpt, and compose

Persuasion : the attempt to influence, convince or entice someone to make a selection (often a purchase)

Propaganda : information (written, verbal, artistic) that promotes a detail viewpoint or set of ideas about a person or consequence. The word indicates information that is biased, misleading, or sometimes hidden that is used in gild to influence views, beliefs, or behavior

Synagogue : Jewish business firm of worship

---

1. Garth Jowett and Victoria O'Donnell, Propaganda and Persuasion, 6 th ed. (California: Sage Publications, 2014), 7 ↩

mcgheeyountered.blogspot.com

Source: https://alg.manifoldapp.org/read/introduction-to-art-design-context-and-meaning/section/54129c96-ca5a-4108-832b-9e3180e85cc8

Share this post